Skip to content 
The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) in the Philippines has opened an investigation into reports that local officials in Maguindanao del Sur enforced a policy targeting individuals believed to be gay or lesbian, according to Philippine News.
The inquiry centers on allegations that community leaders in Barangay Layog, within the municipality of Pagalungan, carried out an operation aimed at identifying residents suspected of being part of the LGBTQIA+ community. Local media referred to the activity as “Operation Supak.”
Residents reported that barangay personnel visited homes and questioned people about their relationships.
According to the Phil Star Global, couples of the same sex were instructed to appear at the municipal office, and some were pressured to separate. Community members said officials justified the action by claiming it followed Islamic guidance on relationships.
CHR stated that the allegations raise serious concerns about violations of privacy, equality, and safety. The agency emphasized that the Philippines has no law banning same sex relationships or criminalizing cohabitation between consenting adults. CHR added that actions targeting people based on perceived orientation have no legal basis under national law.
The situation prompted national reactions after lawmakers and activists called for accountability. Former lawmaker Sarah Elago strongly criticized the reported coercion of same sex couples.
She highlighted that although same sex unions are not legally recognized, the Philippine legal system includes safeguards that prohibit harassment and discrimination. She cited the Safe Spaces Act (RA 11313) and the Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710) as examples of statutes that outline protections for vulnerable groups.
View this post on Instagram
Advocacy groups said the case demonstrates the need for the passage of the long-pending SOGIE Equality Bill. The proposed legislation aims to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. It has been debated in Congress for several years, but remains without final approval.
CHR reported that its regional investigators are now collecting statements, verifying official actions, and reviewing any documents related to the reported operation. The agency said it will also work with local government units to ensure that residents who filed complaints are not exposed to retaliation.
Human rights advocates noted that the incident reflects ongoing challenges faced by LGBTQIA+ residents in parts of the country where conservative beliefs shape local governance.
They argued that even in culturally traditional settings, national laws require equal treatment for all citizens. Public identification of LGBTQIA+ individuals or pressure requiring them to report to authorities can deepen fear and weaken community trust.
CHR encouraged local officials to align their actions with constitutional protections covering dignity, privacy, and equal rights. The commission stated that such protections apply throughout the Philippines regardless of local practices.
The inquiry continues as investigators gather additional evidence from residents and local authorities.
